Is the US banning TikTok? What the sell-or-ban bill just passed by Congress means for you.

Even if President Joe Biden signs the bill into law, it will face a slew of legal challenges from TikTok and its supporters.

For quite a long time, TikTok initiative attempted to persuade the US that the famous online entertainment application utilized by upwards of 170 million Americans was not a danger to public safety.

It lost that battle Tuesday night when the Senate passed the sell-or-boycott TikTok bill with overpowering bipartisan help.

Gotten into a $95 billion unfamiliar guide bundle, the regulation gives Chinese parent organization ByteDance as long as a year to sell TikTok's U.S. tasks or face a boycott. President Joe Biden said he would sign it Wednesday.

"The long undermined TikTok boycott is currently here with the clock beginning once Biden signs the bill into regulation," Wedbush Protections expert Dan Ives said.

Time hasn't run out for TikTok just yet. The legislation will likely face legal challenges from TikTok and its supporters. 

TikTok could not be immediately reached for comment. On Saturday the company issued a statement accusing lawmakers of jamming through a bill that tramples free speech rights, harms American businesses and threatens to shutter a platform that contributes billions to the U.S. economy.

If you want to earn daily 100$  Click Here

Congress passes sell-or-ban bill. Is TikTok going to be banned?

In March, the House voted overwhelmingly to approve a bill to force ByteDance's hand. The bill then moved to the Senate, where its fate was uncertain.

Last week House Speaker Mike Johnson tied it to a foreign aid package for Ukraine and Israel, putting it on a fast track to becoming law and increasing the possibility of a ban in the United States. 

The House on Saturday approved the emergency spending package on a bipartisan 360-to-58 vote. The Senate passed the measure 79-18 Tuesday and it will now head to Biden's desk.

TikTok has said it will exhaust every available legal avenue before considering a sale. It has successfully fought back similar measures.

Why does Congress want to ban TikTok?

Fans of the app flooded lawmakers with angry calls protesting the TikTok legislation. But lawmakers say control of the app by a foreign adversary is too great a risk.

"Many Americans, particularly young Americans, are rightfully skeptical. At the end of the day, they've not seen what Congress has seen. They've not been in the classified briefings that Congress has held, which have delved more deeply into some of the threats posed by foreign control of TikTok," Mark Warner (D-Va.), Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said on the Senate floor Tuesday.

TikTok says it has never been asked to provide U.S. user data to the Chinese government and wouldn’t if asked.

The legislation has heightened tensions with China. Last week Apple removed several apps including Meta’s WhatsApp and Threads from its app store in China at Beijing’s request in apparent retaliation for the legislation.

Senators deny TikTok bill is a 'ban bill'

Senators who supported the legislation denied it was a "ban bill." Warner said lawmakers hope Tiktok "will continue under new ownership."

"For several months now, we’ve heard from constituents how much they value TikTok as a creative platform," he said. "To those Americans I would emphasize, this is not a ban of a service you appreciate."

TikTok has said it considers any law that would force a sale the equivalent of a ban because of the hurdles facing a sale. 

Beijing can block a sale or it can refuse to allow a sale that includes the powerful TikTok algorithm that recommends videos to users.

When would ByteDance be forced to sell TikTok?

The bill itself gives ByteDance nearly a year to divest TikTok – nine months, with a possible three-month extension – far longer than the six-month deadline the original House measure proposed. 

“We think a year is an ample time to allow potential investors to come forward for due diligence to be completed and for lawyers to draw up and finalize contracts,” Sen. Maria Cantwell, (D-Wash.), chair of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, said Tuesday on the Senate floor.

Who is interested in buying TikTok?

"While the price tag will be eye-popping, TikTok's strategic value and consumer platform will have a number of financial and tech strategic players interested," Ives said.

Investor groups and major tech giants including Microsoft, Apple and Oracle will consider bids, according to Ives. He also expects joint bids from a handful of Big Tech companies.

Former Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and "Shark Tank" star Kevin O’Leary have also expressed interest in buying TikTok.

An initial public offering or a spin-off are two other potential outcomes, Ives said.

How would a TikTok ban work?

If signed into law, the bill would prevent app stores like Apple and Google from distributing or updating TikTok and web hosting companies from distributing it.

Banning the app won’t necessarily stop TikTok fans from using it. In 2020 when India banned TikTok after an incident at the Chinese border, TikTok users found workarounds to circumvent the ban.

Those strategies include using a VPN or changing your location on your phone to fool the app stores. Another option is "side-loading" − downloading and installing a bootleg version of the TikTok app from the internet − but it carries the risk of downloading malware.

Where do Biden and Trump stand on a TikTok ban?

Biden supports a forced sale of TikTok but has not called for a ban of the app, his top science advisor said at Semafor's World Economy Summit last week.

"The big issue for TikTok from a national security perspective is about the vast amount of information that the platform is able to collect about people and specifically the fact that because of its ownership there’s a direct line to the People’s Republic of China, which in the geopolitics of today is a deeply concerning issue," Arati Prabhakar, the White House Director of Science and Technology Policy, said.

Former president Donald Trump, who tried to ban TikTok in 2020, posted to Truth Social on Monday: "Just so everyone knows, especially the young people, Crooked Joe Biden is responsible for banning TikTok."

Now that Trump has changed his mind about TikTok, ByteDance could wait out the election to see which party has control after November.

Who opposes the TikTok bill? Free speech advocates

Free speech advocates have spoken out against the possibility of a TikTok ban. They say banning TikTok is the wrong way to address concerns about the practices of social media companies.

"Longstanding Supreme Court precedent protects Americans' First Amendment right to access information, ideas, and media from abroad. By banning TikTok, the bill would infringe on this right, and with no real pay-off,"Nadine Farid Johnson, policy director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, said in a statement. “China and other foreign adversaries could still purchase Americans’ sensitive data from data brokers on the open market. And they could still engage in disinformation campaigns using American-owned platforms.”

The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, a science and technology policy think tank, also opposes the TikTok bill.

"The TikTok ban is bad policy, plain and simple," the foundation's vice president, Daniel Castro, said in a statement. And, he said, "it will not stop China’s techno-nationalist agenda."

Who would benefit from a TikTok ban?

YouTube, Facebook and Instagram would benefit most from a TikTok ban.

"We would expect Meta to be the primary recipient of redistributed TikTok revenue should the company exit the U.S., with Google the likely No. 2 beneficiary," said Wedbush Securities analyst Scott Devitt.

Devitt said a recent survey of TikTok users found that 60% would switch to Facebook or Instagram and 19% would primarily replace TikTok with YouTube. 

Snapchat and Pinterest could also draw users and advertising dollars from TikTok, analysts say.

What do Americans think about a TikTok ban?

The American public remains divided. 

Nearly half of the respondents in a CNBC All-America Economic Survey poll taken in March say TikTok should be banned or sold to a non-Chinese company.

Forty percent of Democrats and 60% of Republicans support a ban or a sale of the popular app, the survey found.

Climate change

 Key realities

1.Environmental change is straightforwardly adding to philanthropic crises from heatwaves, out of control fires, floods, typhoons and storms and they are expanding in scale, recurrence and power.

2.Research shows that 3.6 billion individuals currently live in regions exceptionally vulnerable to environmental change. Somewhere in the range of 2030 and 2050, environmental change is supposed to cause roughly 250 000 extra passings each year, from undernutrition, jungle fever, loose bowels and intensity stress alone.

3.The immediate harm expenses for wellbeing (barring costs in wellbeing deciding areas like horticulture and water and sterilization) is assessed to be between US$ 2-4 billion every year by 2030.

4.Regions with powerless wellbeing foundation - for the most part in non-industrial nations - will be the most un-ready to adapt without help to plan and answer.

5.Lessening emanations of ozone depleting substances through better vehicle, food and energy use decisions can bring about extremely huge increases for wellbeing, especially through diminished air contamination.

Outline

Environmental change presents an essential danger to human wellbeing. It influences the actual climate as well as all parts of both normal and human frameworks - including social and monetary circumstances and the working of wellbeing frameworks. It is in this manner a danger multiplier, subverting and possibly switching many years of wellbeing progress. As climatic circumstances change, more successive and strengthening climate and environment occasions are noticed, including storms, outrageous intensity, floods, dry spells and out of control fires. These climate and environment dangers influence wellbeing both straightforwardly and by implication, expanding the gamble of passings, noncommunicable illnesses, the rise and spread of irresistible sicknesses, and wellbeing crises.

Environmental change is likewise affecting our wellbeing labor force and framework, decreasing ability to give widespread wellbeing inclusion (UHC). All the more in a general sense, environment shocks and developing burdens, for example, changing temperature and precipitation designs, dry spell, floods and rising ocean levels corrupt the natural and social determinants of physical and emotional well-being. All parts of wellbeing are impacted by environmental change, from clean air, water and soil to food frameworks and jobs. Further defer in handling environmental change will increment wellbeing gambles, sabotage many years of upgrades in worldwide wellbeing, and negate our aggregate responsibilities to guarantee the basic liberty to wellbeing for all.

If you want earn daily 80$   Click Here

Environmental change influences on wellbeing

The Intergovernmental Board on Environmental Change's (IPCC) 6th Evaluation Report (AR6) presumed that environment gambles are showing up quicker and will turn out to be surprisingly extreme sooner, and it will be more earnestly to adjust with expanded worldwide warming.

It further uncovers that 3.6 billion individuals currently live in regions exceptionally defenseless to environmental change. Regardless of contributing negligibly to worldwide outflows, low-pay nations and little island creating states (SIDS) persevere through the most brutal wellbeing influences. In weak areas, the passing rate from outrageous climate occasions somewhat recently was multiple times higher than in less weak ones.

Environmental change is influencing wellbeing in a heap of ways, including by prompting demise and sickness from progressively regular outrageous climate occasions, for example, heatwaves, tempests and floods, the disturbance of food frameworks, expansions in zoonoses and food-, water-and vector-borne illnesses, and psychological well-being issues. Moreover, environmental change is subverting large numbers of the social determinants for good wellbeing, for example, jobs, balance and admittance to medical services and social help structures. These environment delicate wellbeing gambles are lopsidedly felt by the most powerless and hindered, including ladies, youngsters, ethnic minorities, unfortunate networks, travelers or uprooted people, more established populaces, and those with hidden ailments.

Despite the fact that it is unequivocal that environmental change influences human wellbeing, it stays testing to precisely gauge the scale and effect of numerous environment delicate wellbeing gambles. Notwithstanding, logical advances continuously permit us to ascribe an expansion in grimness and mortality to a worldwide temperature alteration, and all the more precisely decide the dangers and size of these wellbeing dangers.

WHO information shows 2 billion individuals need safe drinking water and 600 million experience the ill effects of foodborne sicknesses yearly, with youngsters under 5 bearing 30% of foodborne fatalities. Environment stressors uplift waterborne and foodborne infection chances. In 2020, 770 million confronted hunger, prevalently in Africa and Asia. Environmental change influences food accessibility, quality and variety, fueling food and nourishment emergencies.

Temperature and precipitation changes improve the spread of vector-borne illnesses. Without preventive activities, passings from such sicknesses, at present north of 700 000 every year, may rise. Environmental change initiates both quick psychological wellness issues, similar to uneasiness and post-horrible pressure, and long haul problems because of elements like relocation and upset social attachment.

Late exploration credits 37% of intensity related passings to human-initiated environmental change. Heat-related passings among those north of 65 have ascended by 70% in twenty years. In 2020, 98 million more experienced food weakness contrasted with the 1981-2010 normal. The WHO moderately extends 250 000 extra yearly passings by the 2030s because of environmental change influences on illnesses like jungle fever and seaside flooding. In any case, demonstrating difficulties persevere, particularly around catching dangers like dry spell and relocation pressures.

The environment emergency takes steps to fix the most recent 50 years of progress being developed, worldwide wellbeing and neediness decrease, and to additionally augment existing wellbeing disparities between and inside populaces. It seriously endangers the acknowledgment of UHC in different ways, including by intensifying the current weight of sickness and by fueling existing obstructions to getting to wellbeing administrations, frequently at the times when they are generally required. North of 930 million individuals - around 12% of the total populace - spend no less than 10% of their family financial plan to pay for medical services. With the most unfortunate individuals generally uninsured, wellbeing shocks and stresses as of now right now drive around 100 million individuals into neediness consistently, with the effects of environmental change demolishing this pattern.

Environmental change and value

In the short-to medium-term, the wellbeing effects of environmental change will be resolved for the most part by the weakness of populaces, their flexibility to the ongoing pace of environmental change and the degree and speed of transformation. In the more drawn out term, the impacts will progressively rely upon the degree to which groundbreaking activity is taken now to lessen discharges and stay away from the breaking of perilous temperature limits and potential irreversible tipping focuses.

While nobody is protected from these dangers, individuals whose wellbeing is being hurt first and most awful by the environment emergency are individuals who contribute least to its causes, and who are least ready to safeguard themselves and their families against it: individuals in low-pay and hindered nations and networks.

Tending to environmental change's wellbeing trouble highlights the value basic: those most liable for outflows ought to bear the most elevated relief and transformation costs, stressing wellbeing value and weak gathering prioritization.

Need for heinous act

To turn away horrendous wellbeing influences and forestall a huge number of environmental change-related passings, the world should restrict temperature increase to 1.5°C. Past outflows have previously made a specific degree of worldwide temperature climb and different changes to the environment inescapable. Worldwide warming of even 1.5°C isn't viewed as protected, be that as it may; each extra 10th of a level of warming will negatively affect individuals' lives and wellbeing.

WHO reaction!!!

WHO's reaction to these difficulties bases on 3 fundamental goals:

Advance activities that both lessen fossil fuel byproducts and further develop wellbeing: supporting a fast and fair progress to a perfect energy economy; guaranteeing that wellbeing is integral to environmental change relief strategy; speeding up moderation activities that bring the best wellbeing gains; and preparing the strength of the wellbeing local area to drive strategy change and construct public help.

Construct better, more environment strong and ecologically manageable wellbeing frameworks: guaranteeing center administrations, natural supportability and environment flexibility as focal parts of UHC and essential medical care (PHC); supporting wellbeing frameworks to jump to less expensive, more solid and cleaner arrangements, while decarbonizing high-producing wellbeing frameworks; and mainstreaming environment versatility and natural maintainability into wellbeing administration ventures, including the limit of the wellbeing labor force.

Safeguard wellbeing from the large number of effects of environmental change: evaluating wellbeing weaknesses and creating wellbeing plans; coordinating environment risk and carrying out environment informed observation and reaction frameworks for key dangers, like outrageous intensity and irresistible sickness; supporting flexibility and variation in wellbeing deciding areas like water and food; and shutting the funding hole for wellbeing transformation and strength.

Administration and Bringing issues to light: WHO leads in underlining environmental change's wellbeing suggestions, planning to concentrate wellbeing in environment approaches, including through the UNFCCC. Collaborating with significant wellbeing organizations, wellbeing experts and common society, WHO endeavors to implant environmental change in wellbeing needs like UHC and target carbon lack of bias by 2030.

Proof and Checking: WHO, with its organization of worldwide specialists, contributes worldwide proof synopses, gives help to countries in their evaluations, and screens progress. The accentuation is on sending powerful approaches and upgrading admittance to information and information.

Limit Building and Nation Backing: Through WHO workplaces, support is given to services of wellbeing, zeroing in on coordinated effort across areas, refreshed direction, involved preparing, and support for project arrangement and execution as well concerning getting environment and wellbeing subsidizing. WHO drives the Collusion for Extraordinary Activity on Environment and Wellbeing (ATACH), uniting a scope of wellbeing and improvement accomplices, to help nations in accomplishing their responsibilities to environment strong and low carbon wellbeing frameworks.

What are the disadvantages of Pepsi or Coca Cola?

Both Pepsi and Coca-Cola are notable brands with tremendous worldwide reach and faithful client bases. In any case, similar to any item, they additionally have their hindrances:

Wellbeing Concerns: One of the significant detriments related with Pepsi and Coca-Cola is their high sugar content. Ordinary utilization of sweet soft drinks like these can add to medical problems like weight, type 2 diabetes, and tooth rot. Also, they frequently contain caffeine, which can prompt reliance and unfavorable wellbeing impacts in unnecessary sums.

Counterfeit Fixings: Pepsi and Coca-Cola contain fake flavors, varieties, and additives, which a few customers might like to stay away from because of worries about their effect on wellbeing and the climate.

Natural Effect: The creation and dispersion of Pepsi and Coca-Cola items add to ecological issues like fossil fuel byproducts, water use, and bundling waste. Plastic jugs utilized for soda pops add to contamination, particularly when not appropriately reused.

Advertising to Youngsters: Pundits contend that Pepsi and Coca-Cola participate in forceful showcasing strategies designated at kids and youths, which can add to unfortunate dietary propensities and way of life decisions.

Water Use: The two organizations have confronted analysis for their water utilization in regions experiencing water shortage. Concerns have been raised about the consumption of nearby water hotspots for packaging tasks, especially in locales where admittance to clean water is a major problem.

IF YOU WANT TO EARN DAILY 70$  CLICK HERE

Contest: Pepsi and Coca-Cola work in an exceptionally serious market, continually competing for piece of the pie and buyer reliability. This serious scene can prompt forceful promoting systems, cost wars, and possibly untrustworthy strategic policies.

Negative Social Effects: The two organizations have confronted claims of denials of basic liberties in their stock chains, including issues connected with work freedoms, land privileges, and working circumstances in sugar stick and packaging plants.

While Pepsi and Coca-Cola have certain qualities as brands, it's fundamental to consider these weaknesses and settle on informed decisions about utilization in view of individual wellbeing, ecological, and moral contemplations.

فلاح و بہبود کے خدشات: پیپسی اور کوکا کولا سے متعلق اہم نقصانات میں سے ایک ان میں چینی کی مقدار زیادہ ہے۔ ان جیسے میٹھے سافٹ ڈرنکس کا عام استعمال وزن، ٹائپ 2 ذیابیطس اور دانتوں کی خرابی جیسے طبی مسائل میں اضافہ کر سکتا ہے۔ اس کے علاوہ، ان میں کثرت سے کیفین موجود ہوتی ہے، جو غیر ضروری رقموں میں بھروسہ اور صحت کے نامناسب اثرات کا سبب بن سکتی ہے۔

نقلی فکسنگ: پیپسی اور کوکا کولا میں جعلی ذائقے، اقسام، اور اضافی چیزیں شامل ہیں، جن سے صحت اور آب و ہوا پر اثرات کے بارے میں خدشات کی وجہ سے چند صارفین اس سے دور رہنا پسند کر سکتے ہیں۔

قدرتی اثر: پیپسی اور کوکا کولا آئٹمز کی تخلیق اور پھیلاؤ ماحولیاتی مسائل جیسے فوسل فیول کی ضمنی مصنوعات، پانی کا استعمال، اور فضلہ بنڈلنگ میں اضافہ کرتا ہے۔ سوڈا پاپس کے لیے استعمال ہونے والے پلاسٹک کے جگ آلودگی میں اضافہ کرتے ہیں، خاص طور پر جب مناسب طریقے سے دوبارہ استعمال نہ کیا جائے۔

نوجوانوں کے لیے اشتہار: پنڈتوں کا دعویٰ ہے کہ پیپسی اور کوکا کولا بچوں اور نوجوانوں کے لیے وضع کردہ زبردست نمائشی حکمت عملیوں میں حصہ لیتے ہیں، جو بدقسمت غذائی رجحانات اور طرز زندگی کے فیصلوں میں اضافہ کر سکتی ہیں۔

پانی کا استعمال: دونوں تنظیموں نے پانی کی قلت کا سامنا کرنے والے خطوں میں اپنے پانی کے استعمال کے لیے تجزیہ کا سامنا کیا ہے۔ پیکیجنگ کے کاموں کے لیے قریبی واٹر ہاٹ سپاٹ کے استعمال کے بارے میں تشویش کا اظہار کیا گیا ہے، خاص طور پر ایسے مقامات جہاں صاف پانی کا داخلہ ایک بڑا مسئلہ ہے۔

مقابلہ: Pepsi اور Coca-Cola ایک غیر معمولی سنجیدہ مارکیٹ میں کام کرتے ہیں، پائی کے ٹکڑے اور خریدار کی بھروسے کے لیے مسلسل مقابلہ کرتے ہیں۔ یہ سنجیدہ منظر زبردست فروغ دینے والے نظاموں، قیمتی جنگوں، اور ممکنہ طور پر ناقابل اعتماد اسٹریٹجک پالیسیوں کا سبب بن سکتا ہے۔

منفی سماجی اثرات: دونوں تنظیموں نے اپنی اسٹاک چینز میں بنیادی آزادیوں سے انکار کے دعووں کا سامنا کیا ہے، بشمول کام کی آزادیوں، زمین کی مراعات، اور شوگر اسٹک اور پیکیجنگ پلانٹس میں کام کرنے کے حالات سے جڑے مسائل۔

اگرچہ Pepsi اور Coca-Cola میں برانڈز کے طور پر کچھ خصوصیات ہیں، لیکن ان کمزوریوں پر غور کرنا اور انفرادی فلاح و بہبود، ماحولیاتی اور اخلاقی سوچ کے پیش نظر استعمال کے بارے میں باخبر فیصلوں کو طے کرنا بنیادی ہے۔

دجال کیا ہے؟ ?What is Antichrist

دجال کیا ہے؟                       What is Antichrist?

"دجال مشرق سے اپنے آپ کو ظاہر کرے گا، اس کا تعلق یہودی خاندان سے ہو گا، اسے عام طور پر ایک آنکھ کا اندھا بتایا جاتا ہے، اور اس کی پیشانی پر لفظ "کافر" لکھا جائے گا، وہ یروشلم کو فتح کر کے پوری دنیا کا سفر کرے گا۔  مکہ اور مدینہ کے علاوہ ہر شہر۔

 ایک جھوٹے مسیحا کے طور پر، بہت سے لوگ اس سے دھوکہ کھا کر اس کی صفوں میں شامل ہو جائیں گے۔  اس کی مدد شیاطین کی فوج کرے گی۔  اس کی مرضی کے سب سے زیادہ قابل اعتماد حمایتی یہودی ہوں گے، جن کے لیے وہ خدا کی مانند ہوگا۔  اس کی واپسی پر بہت سے کمزور ایمان والے لوگ اس کی زد میں آئیں گے۔  اس کے آنے کے بعد ہماری بیٹیوں اور بیویوں کو گھر میں رکھنا ناممکن ہو جائے گا۔  (یہ کیام کی نشانیاں ہیں)۔

IF YOU WANT TO EARN DAILY 70$       CLICK HERE

"The Antichrist will appear from the east, he will belong to a Jewish family, he is usually described as blind in one eye, and the word "infidel" will be written on his forehead, he will conquer Jerusalem. He will travel to every city except Makkah and Madinah.

 As a false messiah, many will be deceived by him and join his ranks. He will be assisted by an army of demons. The most reliable supporters of his will will be the Jews, to whom he will be like God. At his return many people of weak faith will fall under him. After his arrival, it will be impossible to keep our daughters and wives at home. (These are the signs of the Hour).

 سورہ کہف کی پہلی 10 اور آخری 10 آیات ہمیں دجال کے فتنے سے بچا سکتی ہیں۔  سورہ کہف کی پہلی دس آیات حفظ کرنے کی کوشش کریں۔  اسے روزانہ پڑھنے کی کوشش کریں۔  یہ کوئی مذاق نہیں ہے۔  اس حوالے سے آگاہی بڑھانے کی کوشش کریں۔  یہ ہماری امت کا سب سے بڑا، سخت اور مشکل فتنہ ہے  براہ کرم اس کے بارے میں جانیں کیونکہ دجال ہمارے ایمان سے کھیلنے والا ہے۔

 اللہ ہمیں دجال کے فتنے سے بچائے! آمین!

The first 10 and last 10 verses of Surah Kahf can save us from the temptation of Dajjal. Try to memorize the first ten verses of Surah Kahf. Try to read it daily. This is not a joke. Try to increase awareness in this regard. This is the biggest, severe and most difficult fitna of our Ummah, please know about it because Dajjal is going to play with our faith.

 May Allah protect us from Dajjal's temptation! Amen!

gourmed cola defination

 Gourmed Cola is an exceptionally created drink that offers a great combination of flavors, carefully mixed to entice your taste buds and revive your faculties. It is a carbonated beverage known for its unmistakably rich and fulfilling taste, separating it from customary colas available.

Made with the best fixings and a promise to quality, Gourmed Cola conveys an ideal equilibrium between pleasantness and sharpness, making a reviving and liberal involvement in each taste. Whether delighted in all alone or as a supplement to your number one dinner, Gourmed Cola is the ideal decision for those looking for a top notch refreshment that fulfills both the sense of taste and the spirit.

With its notable flavor profile and obligation to greatness, Gourmed Cola has procured a dependable following of knowing buyers who value its inflexible quality and unmatched taste. Experience the impression of Gourmed Cola today and hoist your reward higher than ever.

if you want to earn daily 50$ click here

گورمڈ کولا ایک غیر معمولی طور پر تیار کیا گیا مشروب ہے جو ذائقوں کا ایک بہترین امتزاج پیش کرتا ہے، آپ کے ذائقے کی کلیوں کو آمادہ کرنے اور آپ کی صلاحیتوں کو زندہ کرنے کے لیے احتیاط سے ملایا جاتا ہے۔ یہ ایک کاربونیٹیڈ مشروب ہے جو اپنے بلا شبہ بھرپور اور بھرپور ذائقہ کے لیے جانا جاتا ہے، جو اسے دستیاب روایتی کولا سے الگ کرتا ہے۔

بہترین فکسنگ اور کوالٹی کے وعدے کے ساتھ بنایا گیا، Gourmed Cola خوشگوار اور نفاست کے درمیان ایک مثالی توازن فراہم کرتا ہے، جس سے ہر ذائقے میں ایک زندہ اور آزادانہ شمولیت ہوتی ہے۔ چاہے اکیلے ہی خوش ہوں یا آپ کے نمبر ون ڈنر کے ضمیمہ کے طور پر، Gourmed Cola ان لوگوں کے لیے ایک بہترین فیصلہ ہے جو اعلیٰ درجے کی تازگی کے خواہاں ہیں جو ذائقہ اور روح دونوں کو پورا کرتا ہے۔

اپنے قابل ذکر ذائقے کے پروفائل اور عظمت کی ذمہ داری کے ساتھ، Gourmed Cola نے جاننے والے خریداروں کی ایک قابل اعتماد پیروی حاصل کی ہے جو اس کے غیر لچکدار معیار اور بے مثال ذائقہ کی قدر کرتے ہیں۔ آج ہی گورمڈ کولا کے تاثرات کا تجربہ کریں اور اپنے انعام کو پہلے سے کہیں زیادہ بلند کریں۔

Reform bureaucracy to save Pakistan. پاکستان کو بچانے کے لیے بیوروکریسی میں اصلاحات کریں۔

Reform bureaucracy to save Pakistan

Put the best people in charge and step out of their way

 KARACHI:

The new Top state leader of Pakistan, Shehbaz Sharif, has illustrated two vital areas of concentration to address the country's monetary difficulties:

Financial strength: He has recognized the requirement for another long haul bailout from the Global Money related Asset (IMF) to settle Pakistan's delicate economy. In any case, he has additionally promised to dispose of Pakistan's reliance on the IMF and work towards monetary independence.

Earnest monetary recuperation plan: He has focused on Pakistan's financial recovery, zeroing in on charge alleviation, financial arrangements, and business support.

These plans mirror the top state leader's obligation to tending to Pakistan's financial and security challenges. Notwithstanding, the progress of these drives will rely upon their viable execution and the collaboration of different partners.

Most importantly, the new government has set up various powerful boards of trustees entrusted with creating plans that will ultimately turn into the guide for the way forward. Boards are frequently not the fastest and most ideal method for getting to an arrangement.

As the American comic Milton Berle put it, "A panel is a gathering that keeps minutes however loses hours." Hopefully the PM's councils don't lose an excessive number of hours since hours are running out for Pakistan.

Nevertheless. At the point when these plans truly do arise they should be carried out. Furthermore, here there is an issue. The implementers, will of need, must be Pakistan's administration. The way this building is presently organized puts the undertaking of execution past its capacity, or so far as that is concerned, its craving. So maybe the principal thing to get done is to change the regulatory arrangement.

There are two fundamental issues with this arrangement. One is that every one of our administrators are 'generalists'. What's more, the second is that they are not remunerated at a level that would draw in the best and most brilliant.

So who is a generalist? In our common assistance you will track down individuals with changed foundations. They have an expansive scope of instructive capabilities; craftsmanship, science, designing, medication, training, financial matters, and then some.

Candidates should finish an extreme assessment. The rare sorts of people who endure the test are enrolled to the common help of Pakistan and sent for preparing at an administration run organization. Here they get genuinely broad schooling zeroing in on how the public authority capabilities. They are informed that once they graduate they can run any administration office. This is the essence of the issue.

In our framework a government worker is pivoted over his vocation starting with one service then onto the next. One day he might be running the service of money and the following the service of oil, or wellbeing, or transport or flight.

IF YOU WANT EARN DAILY 40$  CLICK HERE

None of which he has a ton of familiarity with however has been conned into accepting that he does. This is the generalist. He might have had some significance in a time long since past however today he has turned into a hazardous chronological error that holds up traffic of good administration and progress.

Balance this with the confidential area and you will see that it is a perfect representation. Candidates are selected whose instructive capabilities unequivocally match the disciplines in which they will work until the end of their professions.

his permits them to know basically everything there is to know about their specific field. Also, to stay up to date with the quickly moving speed of progress in this day and age. These are the trained professionals.

So the primary change that should be made to the common help is that it should select and prepare experts for every service. The people who will work, for instance, in the money service, should have money, financial matters or business as their most memorable degrees.

Their preparation, whenever they are enrolled, ought to zero in on finance. And afterward they ought to spend their whole vocations in the money service. This way the public authority man will know the same amount of about finance as the confidential venture investor sitting on the opposite side of the table. He, or rather Pakistan, won't get taken for ride.

The subsequent issue is remuneration. There was a period in the 1950's and 60's the point at which the best and the most brilliant from Pakistan's schools and colleges would have at the first spot on their list of favored managers, in all honesty, the Public authority of Pakistan.

Those that couldn't get it done for an administration work looked for work in the confidential area. Might it at some point be that Pakistan advanced the most in those halcyon days since we had our best and most brilliant running the country?

Here is the essential guideline: Assuming you need the best individuals you need to pay for them. The explanation that our best and most brilliant now head to the confidential area is that they get compensated more. Much more. Now and again the distinction can mind overwhelm.

The secretary of the Service of Money might have a bundle that is some of the time a 10th or even a 20th of a bank Chief. Why then, at that point, could any brilliant and reasonable money graduate need to work for the public authority?

So this should be finished: Compensations of government workers should be raised ten times or more if necessary. This will come for an extreme price. Some will say excessively high for an unfortunate nation like Pakistan. Yet, reality likely could be that the expense will be predominated by the additions in great administration and the evacuation of motivations to participate in degenerate practices.

Also, assuming evidence is required look no farther than Singapore. The public authority there pays its civil servants at standard with the confidential area. Its civil servants are perceived as the best on the planet. What's more, to this end Singapore, when a ratty, decrepit back water port, has now turned into a sparkling city upon slope.

The recipe for Pakistan's prosperity and security is misleading basic: Search out the best and most brilliant for Pakistan's affable assistance, guarantee that they practice, and that they spend their whole professions in the services for which they are prepared, and pay them at standard with the confidential area.

In the end it is actually about individuals. Put the best individuals in control. Also, get out of their way. This is the very thing we in Pakistan have neglected to do. What's more, until we do, no number of boards will save us from ruin.

عمران خان کی گارنٹی کون دے گا؟ Who will guarantee Imran Khan?

عمران خان کی گارنٹی کون دے گا؟

 دو دن قبل مجھے ایک سورس سے معلوم ہوا کہ چند اہم شخصیات عمران خان اوراسٹیبلشمنٹ کے درمیان معاملات کو سلجھانے کے لیے سوچ بچار کر رہی ہیں۔

 اس پر میری ان شخصیات میں سے ایک سے بات ہوئی، جنہوں نے اس بات کی تصدیق کرتے ہوئے مجھے بتایا کہ ''پاکستان کے خیر خواہوں'' کا ایک گروپ جس میں وہ بھی شامل ہیں نہ صرف عمران خان اور ملٹری اسٹیبلشمنٹ کے درمیان بڑھتی کشیدگی کا معاملہ حل کرنے کیلئے حکمت عملی تیار کرنے کیلئے سوچ بچار کر رہاہے بلکہ سیاسی جماعتوں کے درمیان بھی دشمنی اور نفرت کی سیاست کا خاتمہ چاہتا ہے۔

مجھے بتایا گیا کہ اب تک کم از کم تین ''پاکستان کے خیر خواہ'' ایک دوسرے کے ساتھ رابطے میں ہیں اور آئندہ دنوں میں کچھ اور بھی لوگ اس گروپ میں شامل ہو سکتے ہیں تاکہ قومی ہم آہنگی اور سیاسی استحکام کیلئے حکمت عملی پر تبادلہ خیال کیا جاسکے۔ ابھی تک جو تین لوگ آپس میں اس سلسلے میں رابطے میں ہیں اُن میں سے دو سابق وفاقی وزراء ہیں جبکہ تیسری شخصیت ایک معروف ریٹائرڈ تھری اسٹار جنرل ہیں۔ تینوں جانے پہچانے چہرے ہیں۔مجھے بتایا گیا کہ اس مرحلے پر پاکستان کے یہ خیر خواہ اپنی شناخت ظاہر کرنے کے خواہشمند نہیں لیکن آنے والے دنوں میں وہ سامنے آ سکتے ہیں۔

 اس گروپ کیلئے سب سے بڑا چیلنج یہ ہو گا کہ عمران خان اور ملٹری اسٹیبلشمنٹ کے درمیان خلیج کوکیونکر ختم کیا جائے اور عمران خان اور دوسری سیاسی جماعتوں کو کیسے ایک ساتھ بٹھایا جائے۔؟ اس سلسلے میں میری ایک خبر گزشتہ روز جنگ اور دی نیوز میں شائع ہوئی۔کل میرا دوبارہ اپنے ذرائع سے رابطہ ہوا جس پر اُن کا کہنا تھا کہ ممکنہ طور پر اُن کی کوشش کا ایک دو مہینوں میں کوئی نتیجہ نکل سکتا ہے یعنی اس بات کا تعین ہو جائے گا کہ آیا اسٹیبلشمنٹ عمران خان سے بات کرنے کے لیے تیار ہو گی یا نہیں۔

 ''خیر خواہوں'' کے اس گروپ کے لیے شاید سب سے بڑا چیلنج یہ ہو گا کہ عمران خان کی گارنٹی کون دے گا کہ وہ جو بات کریں گے اُس پر قائم بھی رہیں گے۔ عمران خان کا ٹریک ریکارڈ دیکھا جائے تو وہ الزامات لگانے میں بادشاہ ہیں، وہ کوئی بھی الزام کسی پر بھی لگا سکتے ہیں۔ اسٹیبلشمنٹ کے ساتھ اگر کوئی انڈرا سٹینڈنگ ہوتی ہے تو اُس میں عمران خان کو کیا کیارعایتیں دی جا سکتی ہیں۔

 اگر عمران خان یہ مطالبہ کریں کہ موجودہ حکومت کو ختم کر کے اقتداراُن کے سپرد کر دیا جائے تو کیا ایسا ممکن ہے؟ اگر عمران خان کہیں کہ اُن کے اور اُن کی پارٹی کے دعوے کے مطابق اُن کو قومی اسمبلی اور پنجاب اسمبلی میں اضافی سیٹیں مہیا کرنے کے لیے موجودہ قانونی اور عدالتی آپشنز سے بالا کوئی کام کیا جائے تو کیا ایسا ممکن ہے؟ 9مئی کے حوالے سے کیا اسٹیبلشمنٹ کسی عام معافی کا اعلان کر کے فوجی تنصیبات اور شہداء کی یادگاروں پر حملہ کرنے والوں کو بھلا سکتی ہے؟

اس وقت موجودہ حکومت اور فوجی اسٹیبلشمنٹ پاکستان کو معاشی مشکلات سے نکالنے کے لیے یکسو ہیں جس کی بنا پر مجھے ممکن نظر نہیں آتا کہ عمران خان اور تحریک انصاف کو وہ کچھ ملے گا جس کا وہ مطالبہ کرتے ہیں اور جس کا مقصد موجودہ حکومت کو چلتا کر کے عمران خان اور تحریک انصاف کی حکومت کے لیے رستہ ہموار کرنا ہو۔ جن نکات پر اتفاق ہو سکتا ہے وہ یہ ہیں کہ عمران خان اور تحریک انصاف کے رہنماؤں اور ورکرز کے خلاف کیسوں کو میرٹ پر چلنے دیا جائے، بار بار گرفتاریوں سے اجتناب کیا جائے، ایسے مقدمات جن میں کوئی ثبوت نہیں اُنہیں ختم کیا جائے۔

IF YOU WANT TO EARN DAILY 40$  CLICK HERE

 الیکشن کے متعلق معاملات پر بھی مجھے کسی آؤٹ آف دی باکس حل کی توقع نہیں۔ ہاں آئندہ کے لیے ایک ایسے روڈ میپ پر ضرور بات ہو سکتی ہے اور ہونی بھی چاہیے کہ ہم ماضی کی غلطیاں بار بار نہ دہرائیں، سیاستدان مل بیٹھ کر آئین کے مطابق رولز آف دی گیم پر اتفاق کریں۔

 اسٹیبلشمنٹ کے سیاسی کردار کے خاتمے کے لیے آئین کے مطابق ہر ادارے کو اپنے اپنے دائرہ اختیار میں رہ کر کام کرنے کے لیے سیاستدانوں کا مل بیٹھنا لازم ہے۔ کیا عمران خان جو اپنے سیاسی مخالفین کے ساتھ ہاتھ ملانے تک کے لیے تیار نہ تھے اپنے آپ کو بدلنے کے لیے تیار ہوں گے؟