What is scarier, that the US government is no longer a recognizable democracy like it was even 30 years ago or that half the country supports this claiming to be saviors of democracy?

 The worry over the U.S. government's takeoff from an unmistakable vote based system, as it was quite a while back, raises worries about the disintegration of central majority rule standards. This could envelop a decrease in balanced governance, law and order, and the shielding of individual freedoms. Such moves might bring about nerves with respect to the general wellbeing and supportability of the popularity based framework.

At the same time, the division inside the nation where a significant part of the populace upholds changes seen as protecting or upgrading a majority rules government can similarly vex. The view of being "rescuers of a vote based system" might be established in unique convictions about what is a solid majority rule state. This split in popular assessment reflects varying political philosophies as well as presents difficulties to encouraging a durable and joined society.

The transaction of these worries makes a mind boggling dynamic, where the actual quintessence of a majority rules government is addressed, and cultural solidarity turns into a dubious goal. Finding some kind of harmony between developing administration and protecting vote based values is a mind boggling challenge that requests nuanced answers for guarantee the proceeded with imperativeness of the majority rule framework.