Why do anti-gun types insist on calling the AR a "weapon of war?" Do they not realize this is an emotion-laden buzzword that applies to many innocuous weapons and tools?

 The expression "weapon of war" is much of the time utilized by some enemy of firearm backers to describe guns like the AR-15 as having military beginnings and plan. By utilizing this expression, they intend to highlight the potential risks related with such weapons, accentuating their apparent relationship with furnished clashes and military use. The aim is to bring out worry about the capacity of these guns and their likely use in mass shootings or different types of brutality.

Notwithstanding, conversations about firearm wording can be abstract and hostile. Allies of weapon privileges might contend that terms like "weapon of war" misrepresent the qualities of specific guns and that these guns have authentic non military personnel utilizes, for example, self-protection and game shooting. The discussion frequently stretches out past semantics to incorporate more extensive conversations about weapon guideline, individual privileges, and public wellbeing.